| ▲ | nomel 7 hours ago | |
Let's use a non-ambiguous language for this. May I suggest Lojban [1][2]? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban [2] Someone speaking it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxQjwbUiM9w | ||
| ▲ | mike_hearn 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Lojban allows you to speak ambiguously, it just disallows grammatical ambiguity because in the 70s it was hypothesized that NLP understanding was impossible so humans would have to adapt instead of computers. That debate is over; understanding grammar is solved. The new debate is over semantic ambiguity. | ||
| ▲ | dooglius 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It looks like that's about syntactic ambiguity, whereas the parent is talking semantic ambiguity | ||
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||