Surely you see it's somewhat unreasonable? As if it was written by the author you disliked, and until you knew of the fact, you quite enjoyed it.

Quite honestly, I do that sometimes too -- but I _know_ that it's unreasonable.

▲

_dwt an hour ago | parent | next [-]

For me, “interestingly wrong” becomes just “wrong” without human thinking behind it. I wasn’t bowled over by the prose, I just thought it was an uncommon take and didn’t twig the signs it was Claude product.

▲

y0eswddl 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

hard to form an emotional connection with the emotionless

▲

idiotsecant an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Says parent post, while thinking a stack of rocks that looks a little like a fat raccoon is kind of cute.

Humans are designed to form emotional connections with non emotional things. Its sort of our whole deal.

▲

abeindoria 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Eh, People form emotional connections with inanimate objects, so I'm unsure if that's a good enough argument tbf.

	▲	zarzavat an hour ago \| parent [-]
		A djungelskog is not a threat. AI threatens my livelihood and my humanity. The worst part is I have to use it regardless because I would be uncompetitive without it.