Simple. I became one of them. Ultimately, using an AI is a new skill, but you have to treat it like another person that sometimes bullshits you. That's why you leverage agents to refine, do research, and polish.

Ask AI to cite sources and then investigate the sources, or have another agent fact check the relevancy of the sources.

You can use this thing called ralph that let's you burn a lot of tokens at scale by simply having a detailed prompt work on a task and refining something from different lenses. It too AI about an hour to write: https://nexivibe.com/avoid.civil.war.web/

I do this on things that I know very well, and the moment I let it cook and iterate, collect feedback, the results become chef's kiss.

The agentic era that we are in is... very interesting.

▲

000ooo000 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>Ultimately, using an AI is a new skill

It's incredible watching people determine that outsourcing their thinking and work to what has been generously described as a junior coworker is a new 'skill'. Words are losing their meaning, on multiple levels.

	▲	throwaway444422 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Are some people better at this than others? Can people improve? I think the answer to both questions is yes which makes this a skill. Just like being able to use non-LLM Google to search is a skill; I have family members who are amazed at what I can find that they cannot.

▲

quirkot 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

counterpoint: if I have to treat the computer like a person, what's the point of talking to a computer in the first place? Particularly when there are so many other systems that can provide answers without the runaround

▲

mathgladiator 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Humans cost $xx,yyy a year.

Claude max-x20 is $2,400 a year.

I talk to the computer like a person to get the computer to do things that humans used to do. Having managed people before, I'm going all in on AI.

▲

mtndew4brkfst 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Now we watch this viewpoint proliferate thousands and thousands of times over, even if it's less commonly stated so baldly, and yet people still wonder where the doomer viewpoints stem from?

▲

mathgladiator 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, but I am full in on simulation hypothesis, and people are going to enter the matrix... willingly.

https://nexivibe.com/intj.html

	▲	phito 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		While some of the ideas in this do resonate with me (or at least they're entertaining), it's unfortunate that's it's so obviously LLM generated. And some parts of it, like the INTJ exceptionalism, reek of LLM sycophancy, which then turned into to some kind of god complex...