What is your understanding of the luddite movement? I ask because I don't believe many are aware that luddites were not anti-technology. It was a labor movement which was targeted at exploitation by factory owners. Their issue was with factories forcing the use of machines to produce inferior products so owners could use cheaper, low skill labor.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/luddites-definition-wrong-la...

▲

CamperBob2 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Right, wrong, whatever. The one thing every sane person can agree on is that it's a good thing the Luddites didn't prevail.

How much did you pay for the shirt you're wearing now?

▲

hatsix 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'd have been ok if things fell more in their direction... I'm not saying "clear win", but a middle ground that had the machines do the things they're best at while letting humans do the quality work.

	▲	defrost 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> but a middle ground that had the machines do the things they're best at while letting humans do the quality work. By arguing for letting humans work, particularly quality work, you're not especially finding a middle ground, more adopting the 1811 position of the OG Luddites who were opposed to being put out of work.
	▲	idiotsecant an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yeah, that's a fine sentiment in the general, but let's hear some specifics.

▲

y0eswddl 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Once again showing how little you actual understand about the movement you decry.

	▲	smcin 32 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Specifically what is the user's misunderstanding? Be constructive.
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]