> it's not gambling if the most expected outcome actually occurs.

> you have to spend a lot of tokens to keep the error/hallucination rate low

Ironically, I find your comment more effective at convincing me AI coding is gambling than the original article. You're talking about it the exact same way that gamblers do about their games.

▲

dwa3592 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

so your whole argument is that you are convinced that ai coding is gambling because according to you i am talking about it like gamblers talk about gambling?

- Was there anymore intelligence that you wanted to add to your argument?

▲

dwa3592 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

lol that's interesting. care to explain why?

	▲	dminik 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I mean, the most expected outcome does mostly happen. When gambling, you are expected to lose money and you do. I'm not quite convinced that the same isn't true for vibecoding.