Even other communist dictatorships are pretty sick of North Korea's shit!

dopesoap 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Wow so you guys don't have ideological brain worms at all. I can tell you guys have never studied international relations because you refuse to try an take North Koreas concerns seriously. Do I have to remind you that a South Korean attempted a fascist coup recently and that it was left wing organisations and trade unions that mobilised to stop him? Also which "communist dictators" are you talking about, and how do you know this? You do realise that the United States is also a one party state when it comes to foreign policy right?

If you love freedom so much shouldn't this be worrying more? https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy...

For any one interested in learning a bit more about North Korea and how it got to be the country it is I'd suggest Noah Kulwins series Blowback.

	▲	yongjik 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Do I have to remind you that a South Korean attempted a fascist coup recently and that it was left wing organisations and trade unions that mobilised to stop him? Those "left wing organizations" encompass the majority of South Korea, almost 2/3 of the current parliament, and the current sitting government. And may I remind you that South Korea's current "leftist" president recently gifted Trump a golden crown to get favorable deals? He's about as leftist as Joe Biden.
	▲	bit-anarchist 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> Do I have to remind you that a South Korean attempted a fascist coup recently By "fascist", I suppose you mean right-wing. Going by the average RW authoritarian dictatorship, that's still better than the documented NK conditions, specially given that most fall later. > ...[...] and that it left wing organizations and trade unions that mobilized to stop him? Nice cherry picking. Even Yoon's own party turned against him. But even ignoring the right wing here, said left wing organizations are also in opposition to NK. > You do realize that the United States is a one party state when it comes to foreign policy right? That sentence doesn't make sense. There's no such thing as "one party state foreign policy". The idea of a one party state is specifically about a state that is intolerant to any other ideas other than those accepted by the one true party. If you are referring to USA's aggressiveness, may I remind you that that switches between presidents. > If you love freedom so much shouldn't this be worrying more? Whataboutism.
	▲	skinnymuch 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Those scholars are blowhards. Trump is basically the same as any other time. As you state the US is unipolar in how it treats Others. Aka authoritarian. Blowback was great I should finish that season.

▲

skinnymuch 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh yeah you don’t know what you’re talking about haha. The west isn’t a dictatorship! Only the Others.

	▲	bit-anarchist an hour ago \| parent [-]
		While one could scrutinize the accuracy the of the west being a dictatorship (which will likely devolve into a discussion of semantics), I prefer to call attention to the fact that calling North Korea a dictatorship does not require to speak well of the west. Likewise, one can simultaneously criticize the west without protecting its "enemies". Such a binary, poorly critical, way of thinking is ill-suited in pursuing better material conditions for all.