Remix.run Logo
rwmj 5 hours ago

Better to link to the site itself, or one of the reviews?

For an example of a review (picked pretty much at random) see: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260318151256.2590375-1-andr...

The original patch series corresponding to that is: https://lkml.org/lkml/2026/3/18/1600

Edit: Here's a simpler and better example of a review: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260318110848.2779003-1-liju...

I'm very glad they're not spamming the mailing list.

jeffbee 5 hours ago | parent [-]

That is both really useful and a great example of why they should have stopped writing code in C decades ago. So many kernel bugs have arisen from people adding early returns without thinking about the cleanup functions, a problem that many other language platforms handle automatically on scope exit.

overfeed 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Must we do this on every thread about the Linux kernel?

RobRivera 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The beatings will continue until morale improves

vpShane an hour ago | parent [-]

yeah but Linux is love, linux is life. if you really want to get the beatings going:

Rust > C and GNU/Linux should be Rust.

ugh123 15 minutes ago | parent [-]

also vim > emacs

richwater 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

tigen 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This ought to help with that. https://thephd.dev/c2y-the-defer-technical-specification-its...

nurettin 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> stopped writing code in C decades ago.

And what were they supposed to use in 2006? Free Pascal? Ada?

greenavocado 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Someone suggested C++ and you should see the response from Linus

https://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/linus