To be honest, I would prefer "I over-index on experts who were top of the line in the past but didn't stay that way" over "my bad takes are entirely my own and I am proud of it". The former has so much more room for improvement.

>Literally no one is saying this.

Did you not just advise me to go watch a podcast full of "LLMs are literally incapable of inventing new things" and "LLMs are literally incapable of solving new problems"?

I did skim the transcript. There are some very bold claims made there - especially when LLMs out there roll novel math and come up with novel optimizations.

No, not reliably. But the bar we hold human intelligence to isn't that high either.

>my bad takes are entirely my own and I am proud of it"

Sure, but the same could apply to you as well.

>"LLMs are literally incapable of inventing new things" and "LLMs are literally incapable of solving new problems"?

You keep proving that you have trouble resolving closely related ideas. Those two things that you mention does not imply that they are "useless". They are a better search and for software development, they are useful for reviews (at least for a while). But it seems that people like you can only think in binary. It is either LLMs are god like AI, or they are useless.