| ▲ | lnenad 19 hours ago |
| It is not. Why is that relevant to social entities? |
|
| ▲ | lvoudour 19 hours ago | parent [-] |
| How well you interact with other members of a society increases your chances of procreation, survival, knowledge acquisition, ie. it makes sense as a measure of intelligence |
| |
| ▲ | LogicFailsMe 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's a pretty ambiguous definition. The most powerful man in the world right now is not someone I consider a role model for social cognition and yet there he is with the football for the second time demonstrating grandmaster skill at social cognition to get there. | | |
| ▲ | lvoudour 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | You don't have to be empathetic and nice, just good at navigating society. | | |
| ▲ | LogicFailsMe 18 hours ago | parent [-] | | So in all seriousness with a bit of snark: Do you want a malevolent AGI? Because "good at navigating society" as the only benchmark here is how you get a malevolent AGI... Evidence: cuckoos and cheaters all the way down the evolutionary ladder as a winning strategy and arms race against the hard workers. | | |
| ▲ | lvoudour 15 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't like a$$holes but they do exist and they are part of our species, ergo intelligent. My opinion of them doesn't change the fact | | |
| ▲ | LogicFailsMe 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, but we have a choice about whether the AGI is an a$$h0l3 or not. That's the difference here. You do see that right? |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | lnenad 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I agree 100%. |
|
