If you think that everyone who works on a website that is a walled garden is a "pedophile fascist", I don't know what to say to you -- I don't think we live in the same reality.

▲

speedgoose 5 hours ago | parent [-]

It’s not what is written?

▲

johnfn 5 hours ago | parent [-]

You should tell me your interpretation of the quote I excerpted then.

▲

speedgoose 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s about the common and popular walled garden American social medias owned by people that are close and supporting their current elected government.

▲

johnfn 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The quote says "walled gardens owned by pedophilic fascist speed freaks". Not "owned by people close to", "owned by".

▲

speedgoose 4 hours ago | parent [-]

If one supports pedophiles and promote fascist speeches…

▲

johnfn 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It is not "factual" to call these people pedophiles. Maybe you think they are bad for society. Maybe you think their websites are terrible. Maybe you don't like them. Those are all fine things, and you are free to say them! But to say they are factually a pedophile without evidence is not true. It only diminishes the quality of conversation.

	▲	mlrtime 10 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm reading this line of conversations and I can tell you, you're wasting your time. There is NO convincing these people of anything else, they will move the goal posts every time. I've been in these same conversations and it goes nowhere. If you continue, it will move all the way to "If you're not out protesting, voting for X, you are in fact a fascist pedo yourself". Even the mere fact that you question such line of thought... makes you a facist pedo.

▲

pacifika 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

A bad apple spoils the bunch