| ▲ | Waterluvian 16 hours ago |
| It supports at best Python 3.11 code, right? So it’s not unmaintained, no. But the project is currently under resourced to keep up with the latest Python spec. |
|
| ▲ | LtWorf 16 hours ago | parent [-] |
| That is not the same thing at all, and not what he said. |
| |
| ▲ | JoshTriplett 16 hours ago | parent [-] | | It is exactly what I'm referring to. I didn't say there aren't still people around. But they're far enough behind CPython that folks like NumPy are dropping support. Unless they get a substantial injection of new people and new energy, they're likely to continue falling behind. | | |
| ▲ | bigstrat2003 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I didn't say there aren't still people around. You said it was defunct, which would mean there aren't still people working on it. | |
| ▲ | LtWorf 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not what you wrote. Also CPython 3.10 is not EOL so library authors won't be using anything from 3.11 anyway. | | |
|
|
