| ▲ | riffraff 5 hours ago | |||||||
> Code a simple bug fix 30 minutes > Get it code reviewed by the peer next to you 300 minutes → 5 hours → half a day Is it takes 5 hours for a peer to review a simple bugfix your operation is dysfunctional. | ||||||||
| ▲ | thi2 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Its rare that devs are on standby, waiting for a pr to review. Usually they are working on their own pr, are in meetings, have focus time. We talked a lot about the costs of context switches so its reasonable to finish your work before switching to the review. | ||||||||
| ▲ | habinero 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
People are busy, and small bugfixes are usually not that critical. If you make everyone drop everything to review everything, that is much more dysfunctional. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | karel-3d 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
nobody will immediately jump on your code review | ||||||||