| ▲ | ralph84 10 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
If you want to discourage short-term thinking, make the vesting period longer on executive stock grants. Making companies' performance less transparent just opens up more opportunities for insider trading. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cheriot 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Agree and make it two years for long term capital gains. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> If you want to discourage short-term thinking, make the vesting period longer on executive stock It’s 3 to 4 years on average. This isn’t relevant to quarterly filing requirements. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | DesaiAshu 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Could also price in negative externalities of short term trading with higher taxes for that behavior, nudging the markets to focus on value driving investments rather than speculation | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hammock 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Harder to attract talent though (not saying you’re wrong) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | busterarm 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The problem isn't the executives, it's the boards. But board members are largely just a proxy for the large shareholders anyway. E.g., short-term investment strategies are not going away. Working C-levels would almost always much rather take the longer view against the wishes of their boards. | |||||||||||||||||