> automatic assault rifles

Trying hard to embellish your language I see. Might I suggest "military style automatic tactical assault rifle"?

My impression is that topics that involve politics are tolerated, even encouraged. It's politically charged discourse such as yours that's not welcome. It's near impossible to have an intellectual exchange with a political pundit.

I wonder if any VC out there would fund my pitch for an AI enhanced military style automatic tactical assault rifle with a copilot 360 targeting integration to ensure our troops can noscope420 at all times as well as a blockchain layer for auditing discharge events.

▲

MSKJ 2 hours ago | parent [-]

this comment is very pedantic

	▲	fc417fc802 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		There are many objections that could be raised to both my tone and content there but I don't think "pedantic" is one of them. It's certainly mocking. The subject matter is overly political. It's even plausible that it strays across the line laid down by the HN guidelines, although personally I think it's acceptable given the context. Something about fighting fire with fire.