| ▲ | kllrnohj 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||
Your 9900k at 5ghz does work slower than a Ryzen 9800X3D at 5ghz. A lot slower (1700 single core geekbench vs 3300, and just about any benchmark will tell the same story). Clock speed alone doesn't mean anything. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mikrl 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
From the newegg listing: >8 Cores and 16 processing threads, based on AMD "Zen 5" architecture which is the same thread geometry as my 9900K. My main concerns at the time were: 1. More cores for running large workloads on k8s since I had just upgraded to 128G RAM 2. More thread level parallelism for my C++ code Naively I thought that, ceteris paribus and assuming good L1 cache utilization, having more physical cores with a higher clock rate would be the ticket for 2. Does the 9800X3D have a wider pipeline or is it some other microarchitectural feature that makes it faster? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||