This framing is flawed. Even if you accept the framing, the claims are false.
Tibet? Kashmir? Crimea? South Ossetia and Abkhazia?
Somewhat similar situations:
Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar are denied citizenship, face persecution, and live in camps under harsh conditions in Myanmar.
Uyghur Muslims in China are detained and repressed through mass incarceration, forced labor, and cultural assimilation.
The Tigray people in Ethiopia face systemic ethnic discrimination, violence, and exclusion.
In the Western Sahara, the Sahrawi people are discriminated against under Moroccan control, facing displacement and human rights abuses.
In South Sudan, ethnic groups face exclusion and violence in a divided state, with political and economic opportunities limited based on ethnicity.
Minimal research disproves the original claims.
Jews are from Judea. Jews are indigenous to the land of Israel, to the region, the Levant. This doesn't mean other people aren't indigenous. The indegeneity of any other group doesn't preclude the basic fact. Jews are indigenous, not foreign invaders.
About 20% of Israelis are not Jewish. They're mostly Arab and they have full citizenship, the ability to vote, form political parties, access courts, get healthcare (and give healthcare as plenty of doctors and nurses are Arab), education. One prominent example: an Arab Israeli (Palestinian? not sure if he identifies as such) judge convicted a Jewish Israeli President. That judge later became an Israeli Supreme court justice. Typical apartheid? Both were full citizens.
Does this mean Israel is perfect? Nope.
The apartheid libel doesn't actually help Arabs, Jews, Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, or anyone that seeks peace and coexistence. It is inaccurate and counterproductive.
