I saw the demo video, in all honesty, they felt really lifeless to me. The snowboard one was the one that most caught my attention but then the mechanics, and movements of the character, made it seem like it's really bad physics. Do you have a published game I could try rather than these demos? I'm curious

Fair point, these demos are essentially raw single-run output, not cherry-picked or polished. The goal was showing the pipeline works end-to-end, not producing a finished game.

I'm planning to do a proper full game with more iteration and publish it as a playable build, not just a video. That should give a much better sense of actual quality ceiling.

These demos are far, far better than what I expect from one-shot-prompting. It's interesting how our expectations shifted though.

> ... but then the mechanics, and movements of the character, made it seem like it's really bad physics

And when you realize that apps that are vibe-coded are to apps what the games here are to actual games, things get really worrying.

Oh well, back to my Claude Code CLI anyway but I know it's generating a huge amount of crappy code.

i expect the point of the skill isnt that the end games are good, but such that claude can work on any part of the godot engine to help you make a game.

i do think LLMs need a physics skill though. very consistently they are bad at writing physics related code. at least without a lot of prompting and feedback

For what it is, it's amazing. The only issue I would have is the manager goons who would want a commercial game then shove something like this down dev team's throats to "be faster". I can imagine getting the professional polish all through prompts would be a trying experience (especially after not knowing what the code does because it's all generated.)

[dead]