I feel like the real thing that needs to change is we need a more expressive allocation interface than just malloc/realloc. I'm sure that memory allocators could do a significantly better job if they had more information about what the program was intending to do.

▲

liuliu 7 hours ago | parent [-]

There are, look no further than jemalloc API surface itself:

https://jemalloc.net/jemalloc.3.html

One thing to call out: sdallocx integrates well with C++'s sized delete semantics: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/n3778.html

	▲	hedora 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You can also play tricks with inlining and constant propagation in C (especially on the malloc path, where the ground-truth allocation size is usually statically known).