| ▲ | goblin89 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Typical studio grade cans need studio grade equipment to drive them. No surprise if decently sounding headphones that already ship with tailored DAC, amplifier, ANC cost more than decent headphones for which you need to buy all that (and lug around if you travel). Yet, with that taken into account, today the latest DT 1770 Pro still cost over 20% more than the latest AirPods Max. Considering Apple markets Max for audio work, they compete on the same turf. This makes Apple’s offer unusually cost effective, not the other way around. I think this can be attributed to their fragility and inferior sound quality relative to DT 1770 Pro (at the end of a decent signal chain). | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Yet, with that taken into account, today the latest DT 1770 Pro still cost over 20% more than the latest AirPods Max. Not sure where you're looking, but seems I paid 535 EUR for my beyerdynamics (and that's what Amazon sells them for right now too), meanwhile these Apple headphones cost 579 EUR, so seems it's opposite really, studio-grade headphones being cheaper than the consumer-grade hardware Apple sells. > Considering Apple markets Max for audio work They might be marketed like that, because it influences what wealthy consumers chose to buy, but AFAIK, no one is sitting with AirPods Max in their studios for work, at least from what I've been able to tell. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||