> If you want to make that argument, you'd at least need to look at the proportion of the population that's Western European, not just British.

The page I linked shows 53,8% white in 2021. Even if you count the majority of whites as West Europeans (and not East Europeans), they were under 50% in 2021, probably even less today.

If you have more accurate and up to date data, please share.

But that misses the point. I don't say London is not high-trust because of the non-Western population. I say London is not a western city anymore because of its population.

▲

eru 4 hours ago | parent [-]

London is a western city, because of its location and culture.

London has been a city of traders and other foreigners since at least the days of the Romans.

	▲	miroljub 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> London is a western city, because of its location and culture. The dominant culture of the local population is not "Western" anymore. > London has been a city of traders and other foreigners since at least the days of the Romans. Is it? Let's look at the official data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_London Percentage of white population in London over the years: - 1961 - 97,7% - 1966 - 95,5% - 1971 - 92,6% - 1981 - 86,6% - 1991 - 79,8% - 2001 - 71,15% - 2011 - 59,79% - 2021 - 53,8% It's clear that, up until very recently, London was a city of traders and other foreigners living there among the highly homogenous local population.