| ▲ | Sharlin 6 hours ago |
| @ExAr I suspect your comment was downvoted to oblivion because people didn't realize you're the OP and thought you were an LLM summarizer bot :( |
|
| ▲ | jagged-chisel 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The comment reads like an LLM summary. And we don’t typically get an OP summary on a new post. Just post it and let people read it. |
| |
| ▲ | xnorswap 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | HN appears to encourage it, because it shows a text box which becomes a top level comment when you submit, although it isn't obvious that will happen. | | |
| ▲ | Sharlin 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Huh, that definitely explains it. I wonder how many people know that. In that case it's particularly unfortunate to downvote the OP simply for filling a field in the submission form! Sigh… I guess it's another case of LLMs having made the world a little worse for everybody. | | |
| ▲ | jagged-chisel 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don’t think it’s because the comment was submitted. I think it’s because it reads like LLM output. Personally, I’ve only ever provided a summary if I felt the headline wasn’t clear enough. | | |
| ▲ | Sharlin 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, but before LLMs we didn't have "reads like LLM output" as a downvote reason. In 2022 nobody would've had qualms with the phrasing of the comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | jacquesm 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That's perfectly ok, they're using HN almost exclusively for promotion. See comment/submission history. |
| |
| ▲ | Sharlin 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | But the articles are well-researched, very high quality (the illustrations in particular are incredible), and in every way prime HN material, and there's no money involved as far as I can see. I definitely don't have any qualms about self-promotion of this sort of stuff. |
|