| ▲ | nighthawk454 8 hours ago | |||||||
There's trillions of dollars sitting in indexes that are quite literally 'passively' invested. Virtually everything holds this bundle in one way or another. Passive indexing has both outperformed and overtaken active investing - leading a lot of money into VOO/VTI/QQQ/etc that track the S&P500 or some other index ("the market"). For retirement funds like 401ks, retail contributes money every paycheck that gets routed into these indexes. There may not even be much of a choice - your 'plan' may only let you pick some kind of "Target Date Fund" and then the institution picks what it goes into, usually indexes. If you fully actively managed your own money and picked mostly individual stocks (not broad indexes) then yeah you could change your allocations. But there's a lot of money already in. | ||||||||
| ▲ | markisus 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
QQQ is problematic because it’s influenced by strange back room dealings with Space X, if the article is to be believed. VTI is different. It literally tracks all public stocks, weighted by market cap so no such manipulation is possible. If a bunch of people will be forced to buy Space X (QQQ holders), active investors will short the stock in anticipation of market correction and money will flow from those who were forced to buy. I’m sure there are other ways to take advantage of a forced buyer situation. Total market will be unaffected, assuming efficient market hypothesis / no arbitrage. | ||||||||
| ||||||||