Wow, that's such a drastic different experience than mine. May I ask what toolset are you using? Are you limited to using your home grown "AcmeCode" or have full access to Claude Code / Cursor with the latest and greatest models, 1M context size, full repo access?

I see it generating between 50% to 90% accuracy in both small and large tasks, as in the PRs it generates range between being 50% usable code that a human can tweak, to 90% solution (with the occasional 100% wow, it actually did it, no comments, let's merge)

I also found it to be a skillset, some engineers seem to find it easier to articulate what they want and some have it easier to think while writing code.

▲

ramraj07 an hour ago | parent [-]

I used to think that the people who keep saying (in March 2026) that AI does not generate good code are just not smart and ask stupid prompts.

I think I've amended that thought. They are not necessarily lacking in intelligence. I hypothesize that LLMs pick up on optimism and pessimism among other sentiments in the incoming prompt: someone prompting with no hope that the result will be useful end up with useless garbage output and vice versa.

▲

oh_my_goodness 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Exactly. You have to manifest at a high vibrational frequency.

▲

bitwize an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

This is kinda like that thing about how psychic mediums supposedly can't medium if there's a skeptic in the room. Goes to show that AI really is a modern-day ouija board.

	▲	ctrust 29 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The accurate inferences that can be drawn from subtle linguistic attributes should freak you out more than they do.