| ▲ | jacquesm 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
For those of you for who it is working: show your code, please. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sroerick an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Here's one success I had - https://github.com/sroerick/pakkun It's git for ETL. I haven't looked at the code, but I've been using it pretty effectively for the last week or two. I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending it to anybody else, but it was basically one-shotted. I've been dogfooding it on a number of projects, had the LLM iterate on it a bit, and I'm generally very happy with the ergonomics. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thangalin 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'll bite. Here's a 99.9% vibe-coded raw Git repository reader suitable for self-hosted or shared host environments: https://repo.autonoma.ca/treetrek There's still some work to do on the rendering side of model objects. Developing the syntax highlighting rules for 40 languages and file formats in about 10 minutes was amazing to see. https://repo.autonoma.ca/repo/treetrek/tree/HEAD/render/rule... | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | johnfn 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Why is this the attitude when it comes to AI? Can you imagine someone saying “please provide your code” when they claim that Rust sped up their work repo or typescript reduced errors in production? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sigmar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | zcw100 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Why so every armchair reviewer can yell, "Slop!"? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||