| ▲ | m-hodges 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Should art not of a point of view? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | radiator 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
That is the whole point. Since decades, it has a single point of view, failing to represent the majority of the people. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gzread 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Some is reasonable and then some is obviously just what rich people want you to think. Like America paid Hollywood a lot to always show the US armies being macho and always on the right side of wars. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ludicrousdispla 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Should a sentence have a verb? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dmitrygr 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> Should art not of a point of view? It can, sure. However, I will not pay to be lectured to on topics I have no interest getting lectured on. I'll keep my money, they can keep the sermon. Let's see who has more to gain from listening to the other. If they want my money, what I want to hear/see matters a whole lot more than what they want to preach to me. They simply forgot the golden rule: he who has the gold -- makes the rules. Let them rediscover it. | ||||||||||||||