| ▲ | wtallis 4 hours ago | |||||||
The consumer "Optane memory" products were a combination of NVMe and Intel's proprietary caching software, the latter of which was locked to Intel's platforms. They also did two generations of hybrid Optane+QLC drives that only worked on certain Intel platforms, because they ran a PCIe x2+x2 pair of links over a slot normally used for a single X2 or x4 link. Yes, the pure-Optane consumer "Optane memory" products were at a hardware level just small, fast NVMe drives that could be use anywhere, but they were never marketed that way. | ||||||||
| ▲ | myself248 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Exactly. I happen to have all AMD sitting around here, and buying my first Optane devices was a gamble, because I had no idea if they'd work. Only reason I ever did, is they got cheap at one point and I could afford the gamble. That uncertainty couldn't have done the market any favors. | ||||||||
| ▲ | amluto 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I feel like this is proving my point. You can’t read “Optane” and have any real idea of what you’re buying. Also… were those weird hybrid SSDs even implemented by actual hardware, or were they part of the giant series of massive kludges in the “Rapid Storage” family where some secret sauce in the PCIe host lied to the OS about what was actually connected so an Intel driver could replace the OS’s native storage driver (NVMe, AHCI, or perhaps something worse depending on generation) to implement all the actual logic in software? It didn’t help Intel that some major storage companies started selling very, very nice flash SSDs in the mean time. | ||||||||
| ||||||||