Before edit:

> You've started calling me names so I won't bother trying to engage any further. Thanks for the discussion.

A note to future readers of this thread: observe the inconsistency between the poster's stated positions and decide whether you believe that their words are genuine (and their positions/advocacy are worth taking into consideration) in light of that.

▲

matheusmoreira an hour ago | parent [-]

Resolving inconsistencies between my ideas is the entire reason why I come here to discuss them. I'm just not willing to do it while being accused of bad faith and of having no reading comprehension.

	▲	throw10920 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Factually, you do either have bad reading comprehension or are operating in bad faith, because otherwise you could not have made this statement: > So if your so called authorities passed a law saying you're required to participate in some atrocity such as genocide, you'd do it with a clean conscience? Okay. No need to respond. This is just documentation for future HN readers.