It feels so disrespectful sometimes too, having to read a long paragraph that conveys so little meaning knowing full well the original prompt was probably very short and I'm now wasting extra time parsing the hollow LLM text expansion.

▲

stingraycharles 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Easy fix: use an LLM to summarize it.

(only half-joking, a part of me fears that this is the reality we’re moving towards)

▲

mrwh 7 hours ago | parent [-]

That's absolutely what's happening already: write for me for the writer, summarise this for me for the reader. At some point it will become clear how absurdly wasteful we're being (right now, we're being paid to ignore that waste).

	▲	devsda 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> write for me for the writer, summarise this for me for the reader. It's funny though. For computer to computer conversation, we have invented (deflate+inflate) algorithms to save bandwidth, time and money. On the other hand for human to human communication, we are in the process of inventing a (inflate+deflate) method and at the same time we are spending insane amounts of time, money & bandwidth to make it possible!
	▲	rogerrogerr 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		We need to come up with a catchy buzzword salad to market to executives. Something like "increased communication efficiency between workers by direct brain-email-brain interface"