| ▲ | kybernetikos 3 hours ago | |||||||
I don't want to give the impression that I don't find the whole direction of travel concerning, because I do, but as I understand it, the requirement is that the system administrator assigns ages to the users on their system. That seems pretty reasonable to me, and maybe even like a good idea in some scenarios. As far as I know, we aren't talking about software that fights against the interests of the system owner - that's the admin. In fact, I think this might be a feature I would even want. | ||||||||
| ▲ | skissane an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> but as I understand it, the requirement is that the system administrator assigns ages to the users on their system. That seems pretty reasonable to me, and maybe even like a good idea in some scenarios Does it require exact age, or just a flag >=18 vs <18? It seems like this could be trivially met by something like a file /etc/userages, where if a login is missing from that file, it is assumed they are >=18 - and a missing file is equivalent to an empty file | ||||||||
| ▲ | user3939382 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's a shim for a legal requirement to tie TPM to your license and then to all online activity and computing. | ||||||||
| ||||||||