Remix.run Logo
kybernetikos 3 hours ago

I don't want to give the impression that I don't find the whole direction of travel concerning, because I do, but as I understand it, the requirement is that the system administrator assigns ages to the users on their system. That seems pretty reasonable to me, and maybe even like a good idea in some scenarios. As far as I know, we aren't talking about software that fights against the interests of the system owner - that's the admin. In fact, I think this might be a feature I would even want.

skissane an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> but as I understand it, the requirement is that the system administrator assigns ages to the users on their system. That seems pretty reasonable to me, and maybe even like a good idea in some scenarios

Does it require exact age, or just a flag >=18 vs <18? It seems like this could be trivially met by something like a file /etc/userages, where if a login is missing from that file, it is assumed they are >=18 - and a missing file is equivalent to an empty file

user3939382 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's a shim for a legal requirement to tie TPM to your license and then to all online activity and computing.

SV_BubbleTime an hour ago | parent [-]

I’m glad some people see this because the number of “oh but it’s just a small legal requirement they’re imposing” is nuts.