| ▲ | dev1ycan 7 hours ago | |||||||
We are already in some sense past the threshold of sats required for a potential civlizational collapse that would be caused by the loss of access to space. There are way too many sattelites, starlink militarizing means it's a viable target now for enemy nations, any one of them taking out a couple sats and causing debris would cause a chain reaction that would effectively turn space into a dump, let's not even mention that military = more money = more sats, making it even riskier. Or the fact that at any moment those sats could also die from a carrington+ level event. | ||||||||
| ▲ | WalterBright 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> any one of them taking out a couple sats and causing debris would cause a chain reaction that would effectively turn space into a dump You may not realize how big space is relative to the size of a few sats. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | XorNot 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
...there was civilization long before satellites. The relative impact of Kessler syndrome is honestly overblown: we're simply not that dependent on satellites for day to day activities. It would be an economic disaster, but those aren't civilization ending. | ||||||||