| ▲ | rasz 10 hours ago | |
Especially in light of that early war elon confession about disabling terminals mid Ukraine op. Another not great data point is https://militarnyi.com/en/news/ukraine-starlink-data-traffic... "Starlink satellite traffic in Ukraine fell by about 75% after SpaceX shut down its terminals in the occupied territories of the country." By now it came to light russians for example had starlinks on every assaulting tank in addition to long range drones. | ||
| ▲ | dmix 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
That story keeps being spun by people who don’t read articles (or don’t expect people to). What SpaceX did there was limit the use of Starlink in Russian controlled territory. The very same new pattern of Ukraine whitelisting and geofencing access which is what everyone is praising today. The only reason Ukraine complained was their special ops were running drone boats deep in Russian territory. After they asked for permission (following this controversy) SpaceX did a deal with DoD to let them manage those special cases allowing its use behind enemy lines. Starlink has been nothing but positive for Ukraine | ||