| ▲ | ProllyInfamous 5 hours ago | |
Some sort of pre-emptive auto-opt-AI't. It's ridiculous that AIco's arguments are dwindling down to "it's not copyright infringement to ingest others' work and make 'derivatives' [which often are identical to original authors' works]." ---- We desperately need younger politicians, who can not only keep up with information more sharply (i.e. aren't legally decades-retireable), but also are of the age where their own children are being affected by government re-funding flows away from youth/education/future. At this point I'm willing to concede that our future probably has companies' individual LLM/genAI products competing against one-another, as digital politicians ["the digital pimp, hard at work... we have needs"--Matrix' Mouse]. Nobody knows how either flesh nor silicon congressmen work, inside; but I think the latter could act more human[e]ly... | ||
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Do you believe that for younger people this question (about derivativeness) is clearly settled? If so, how? | ||