| ▲ | modeless 12 hours ago |
| Did you read the first sentence? > In this piece, two researchers from PLA-affiliated National University of Defense Technology argue that |
|
| ▲ | cwillu 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| When you were a kid, did you stop listening when your parents said “Santa”, or did you keep listening in order to glean useful information from their propoganda, even knowing that Santa isn't real? |
| |
| ▲ | stinkbeetle 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Were you under the impression the Chinese Communist Party has been telling you sweet lies only because they find joy in seeing your childlike naivety and wonder? | | |
| ▲ | cwillu an hour ago | parent [-] | | The general principle of extracting useful information from the scenario “(party a) tells lies because (ulterior motive b)” transcends the particular values of party a and motive b |
|
|
|
| ▲ | oscaracso 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Thanks; I missed that and almost sullied my mind reading an argument formulated by a potential adversary to the United States of America. |
| |
| ▲ | Erem 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Isn't sully your mind a bit harsh? As long as you read with the article's authorship in mind, it's useful to learn what thoughts your adversary wishes to influence and why. |
|
|
| ▲ | cwillu 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Did you stop reading at the first sentence?? |
| |
| ▲ | jas- 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes. It is the equivalent of reading a technical review of a product by the product owner |
|