| ▲ | hvb2 8 hours ago | |
> Yes, these things do best when they have a (simulated) environment they can make mistakes in and that can give them clear and fast feedback. This always felt like a reason to throw it at coding. With its rigid syntax you'll know quickly and cheaply if what was written passes an absolute minimaal level of quality. | ||
| ▲ | eru 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Well, rigid syntax, type checkers, automated tests, etc. They all help. | ||