Ok so you speak with certainty about the capabilities of something you don’t use and therefore have no experience of.

Childish and naive.

If you said you’ve been using Claude heavily and it’s never done better than you on your own, then your position would be credible.

▲

vips7L 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Sure pal. Keep outsourcing your job. I’ll be here when you need help and are unemployed.

▲

thatguymike 8 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s… not how the labour market works

▲

vips7L 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Of course. That’s because the labor market prefers cost over quality. The labour market will always prefer cheap and fast code that works at first glance. That is how capitalism works. That has nothing to do with my capabilities. It has nothing to do with the fact that I will always outperform a shitty statistical model. It has everything to do with the fact that most of you are too lazy to think. It has everything to do with most of you sucking and being too lazy to your job.

▲

hewasahaterboy 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I think you need to take a deep breath and calm down.

▲

vips7L 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Perfectly calm mate. Maybe you should try to factually argue against my position? Probably not though. Your account was created 30 minutes ago and likely a bot.

	▲	minimaxir 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		My account was created 14 years ago. You need to calm down. There is a reason discussions about agent use have been on Hacker News every other day, and it's not a grand conspiracy. Even in this submission, people have talked about how they have used Claude Code and its longer context window successfully as a tool for programming, even if they may be technically skilled to do it themselves. However, if you assume that every commenter is acting in bad faith, then there's no point in continuing.