[flagged]

What? No you can't.

And: it remains perfectly OK to study racial differences in IQ. It's an actively studied topic. In fact, it's studied by at least three major scientific fields (quantitative psychology, behavioral genetics, and molecular genetics). The idea that you can't is a cringe online racist canard borne out of the fact that the studies aren't coming out the way they want them to.

▲

AuryGlenz 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Does it now? Noah Carl would disagree. He was a researcher at Cambridge University that was dismissed after an open letter signed by over 1,400 academics and students accusing him of "racist pseudoscience" for merely arguing that race-IQ research should not be off-limits.

James Flynn (of the Flynn effect) has also publicly stated that grants for research clarifying genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ gaps weren't approved because of university fears of public furor.

	▲	tptacek 11 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You're trying to axiomatically win an argument that is already settled empirically. It won't work. You can just read the papers. My point being: the papers exist, and more are published every year. Once you acknowledge that, your argument is dead. Literally no matter what the papers say. Don't make dumb arguments. Noah Carl has a sociology doctorate. He doesn't work in the fields that study this; he just tries to launder his way into them. Flynn is, famously, a race/IQ skeptic.
	▲	akerl_ 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		https://medium.com/@racescienceopenletter/open-letter-no-to-... https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/may/01/cambridge-... > for merely arguing that race-IQ research should not be off-limits. Help me connect the dots here.