| ▲ | arjie 13 hours ago |
| I’d say Wikipedia definitely has a strong “woke” bent to it. Either in the language or the choice of what facts to show. Here’s an example I deleted that had been there for quite a while https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salvadoran_gang_c... I really like Wikipedia, though, and I think over time we will get around to fixing it up. |
|
| ▲ | klausa 12 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Why did you feel this passage was worth deleting? |
| |
| ▲ | arjie 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Anyone familiar with Wikipedia etiquette knows how to find the answer to this question. Rather than getting into an argument here about a subject there, I'd prefer you familiarize yourself with the norms of that community, and if you already have or are experienced with them, then you know where to discuss the subject guided by those norms. | | |
| ▲ | scared_together 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | But you’re responding to a comment here, not there. So why not abide by the norms that prevail here? |
|
|
