| ▲ | cladopa 15 hours ago | |||||||
You mean the 80% of the workforce that was fired and the company continued running just fine? Usually just firing 3 to 5% of any company workers have terrible consequences for the company that does it. It does not speak so well about the workers. | ||||||||
| ▲ | mattbillenstein 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
He also cut 80% of the traffic... And the fact that it kept running with him willy nilly pulling network cables is a credit to the work they did to make it resilient to failure. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | keeda 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I don't understand this take. Do people think engineers go in to work to turn handcranks to keep the machines running? It's actually a credit to the automation built by the engineers he fired that it kept running! At the time I joked that like Chaos Monkey, we should have an "Elon Monkey" to "fire" arbitrary people by sending them on mandatory vacations with no connectivity to see what falls over. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | watwut 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It was significantly worst, could not keep ads, became overrun by bots. The quality went down significantly. And earnings too. | ||||||||