Anthropic, maybe, but what is the philosophical niche of OpenAI? Their only consistent philosophical position about AI is "let's make more money".

▲

tibbar 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think OpenAI is more of an aesthetic. Very... Apple-like, polished, with an eye towards making really cool stuff. And aesthetics are a type of philosophy.

This is less noble than how Anthropic presents themselves but still much more attractive to many than XAI.

▲

tokioyoyo 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The feeling on the street is that Anthropic IS the Apple of the AIs.

▲

tibbar 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Come now, surely Anthropic is a premium Linux distribution.

	▲	10 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	ysleepy 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		And Apple a premium Unix derivative?

▲

energy123 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

To a researcher, the aesthetic is more like Bell Labs, with many research teams working with some autonomy, which is why the public naming of model releases appears chaotic. Very different to the top-down approach of Apple.

▲

j_maffe 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> aesthetics are a type of philosophy.

What philosophy is that?

	▲	dbspin 14 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's literally called aesthetics, the philosophical approach is the original meaning of the word - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetics Properly, focusing on aesthetics as an ethic would be practicing the philosophy of aestheticism - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aestheticism
	▲	hoppyhoppy2 14 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetics

▲

small_model 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"You can use my model to kill others if Dario won't do it sir"