| ▲ | stainablesteel 17 hours ago | |
im not surprised, grok definitely falls behind as both a coding agent and a research tool. claude codes the best, gpt is the best research tool, and grok is really only great at videos. which isn't a huge loss, but videos don't have the same functional capacity as academic topics and coding | ||
| ▲ | alephnerd 17 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> grok is really only great at videos. which isn't a huge loss, but videos don't have the same functional capacity as academic topics and coding With the right product leadership, this could actually be a killer app usecase for the entertainment industry as well as human-AI user interface - most people find text and typing to be a counterintuitive user experience (especially those whose day job isn't directly touching code or Excel). Additionally, CodeGen as a segment is significantly oversaturated at this point, and in a lot of cases an organization has the ability to armtwist a 4th party data retention guarantee from Anthropic or OpenAI to train their own CodeGen tools (ik one F50 that is not traditionally viewed as a tech company going this route). That said, Musk has a reputation of internally overriding experienced product leaders with a track record. It's a shame because Grok and xAI had potential, and it wouldn't hurt to have another semi-competitive foundation model player in the US from a redundancy and ecosystem perspective. | ||