| ▲ | cryzinger 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Neanderthal skulls have huge brow ridges and lack chins, with a projecting midface that results in more prominent noses. But the recreated face suggests those differences were not so stark in life. This surprised me enough to scroll back up and look at the reconstruction again, because it looks the woman definitely has (what I would think of as) a chin--which supports the "not so stark in real life" part. But if the skulls are that different, how would a Neanderthal face end up looking so similar to a human's? Did they have cartilage or something that doesn't get preserved in these skeletal remains? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | quantified 3 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whatever the differences, they would have been attractive enough to Homo Sapiens to breed with. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||