Remix.run Logo
Someone1234 4 hours ago

If Apple continues with the budget Neo brand into a 12 GB iteration, I can see this becoming more realistic (rather than a novelty). That being said, Parallels may need to review its licensing with a budget tier in mind. Few will buy a cheap computer and then pay what Parallels charges for a license (regardless if one-time or subscription).

They need to introduce something below the Standard license targeting the Neo. What I'd personally consider is:

- Standard gets 16 GB vRAM (to perfectly target the base MacBook Air). But leave it at 4-6 vCPUs to not compete with the Pro (still for general computing, not power-users)

- New "Lite" tier with 8 GB vRAM max for the Neo (4 vCPUs). Increasing to 12 GB vRAM if the Neo does.

Then you target a $89 price point one-time-purchase for the "Lite" tier. Essentially three plans, targeting your three major demographics: budget, standard, and pro/power-user.

zitterbewegung 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This isn't a novelty it will crush the low end of the PC market. No one cares if the next iteration will be better with 12GB of ram. The workloads that people say that 8GB can't handle will be ones that the actual users will either wait or tolerate. I've been noticing that people who review the Macbook Neo basically don't get the point [1] and just the headline of this article matters that VMs work and thats a big win. The most ridicuous thing about the laptop is that it appears to be reparable which sort of tells me this is a template similar to the M1 Air of the future laptop designs that Apple will come out with. [2]

[1] https://samhenri.gold/blog/20260312-this-is-not-the-computer...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbPCGqoBB4Y

Someone1234 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> This isn't a novelty it will crush the low end of the PC market.

You took what I said out of context and then replied to something else. Running Parallels on a Neo is a novelty. Parallels is both what the thread is about AND what my reply was expressly about.

Nobody can reasonably read what I wrote, in context, and believe I was referring to the computer itself as a novelty.

zitterbewegung 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Sorry, I misread your post I can't edit it anymore and I should have read into your post and it was a knee jerk reaction on my part.

awesome_dude 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I saw the other day people complaining about AI slop being posted on this site by new accounts - which I agree is bad.

Someone suggested that people with 10k karma and/or 10 years subscription to this site should be able to do things (such as auto-ban) to those accounts.

The account that misrepresented your comment and thus acted in bad faith is one of those 10k+ accounts.

To me, this is a data point showing the fallacy of long term subscription and/or karma accrual as evidence of their quality/good faith abilities

zitterbewegung 18 minutes ago | parent [-]

I admit now after rereading that I did misrepresent what they said and I should have read their comment more closely and it was a knee jerk reaction and that its my fault.

gamblor956 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Most people run Windows just fine on cheap laptops with 4GB of RAM.

These won't run Crysis, but they don't need to.

bitwize 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Windows doesn't run "just fine" on 4 GiB of RAM. I had a laptop with 6; Windows 10 became barely usable. If you want to run one, small, program at a time I think you'll be ok. Forget about web browsing; you'll get one tab and it'll be slow.

johnebgd 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Agreed. Windows 10/11 can run just fine on 4GB of RAM. You just can't run anything inside of Windows 10/11 with 4GB of RAM.

The last version of Windows that felt like 4GB of RAM was performant for me with applications was Windows XP. Not that every computer running the 32-bit edition of Windows XP could even see/utilize a full 4GB of RAM properly, but at least it was fast.

hn_acc1 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

HDD or SSD? SSD can effectively make up for SOME amount of less RAM due to faster swapping, in my experience.

bitwize 35 minutes ago | parent [-]

2015 laptop, spinning rust. Nevertheless, it was at least somewhat acceptable at purchase, but crapware installed with successive system updates brought it to a standstill. An SSD might've helped, but not by much. I wiped it and put Kubuntu on it to give to my wife, for whom it ran acceptably. She gave it back when she got a shiny new MacBook Air.

hulitu an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> Most people run Windows just fine on cheap laptops with 4GB of RAM.

Windows 7. Windows 10 eats about 6GB (custom IoT with a lot of things disabled).

Neo is a parody of a computer.

johnebgd an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Neo is powered by a fast and battery-friendly chip. It's definitely not a novelty any more than Chromebooks or Windows 11 notebooks with integrated graphics have been.

monegator 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

lolwut?

check your install mate

conradev 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

VMWare Fusion is free, even if it is a pain in the butt to download. It also has GPU paravirtualization for Linux/Windows which is the only reason I use a proprietary VMM on macOS these days.

spullara 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can also use UTM to run Windows for free and it is open source.

https://mac.getutm.app

LoganDark 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Last I checked UTM doesn't have GPU acceleration. Parallels' proprietary GPU driver is the only reason to pay for it.

fragmede 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

http://tart.run works great for running macOS (and Linux) VMs on macOS if you're technical. It's free for non-commercial uses too! (Don't think there's GPU acceleration tho).

Asmod4n 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Apple already sells that, it’s called MacBook Air.

2 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]