>it create difficulty for undocumented people to access the web

Why is this such a sticking point in US politics? If the "undocumented" people aren't supposed to be in the country in the first place, why should rest of society cater to them? Even if you're against age verification for other reasons, dragging in the immigration angle is just going to alienate the other half of the population who don't share your view on undocumented people, and is a great way to turn a non-partisan issue into a partisan one. It's kind of like campaigning for medicare for all, and then listing "free abortions and gender affirming surgery" as one of the arguments for it.

▲

ryandrake 42 minutes ago | parent [-]

There are many ways to not have a state or national ID document in the USA. You might simply not have a driver license or passport. That's totally legal. You might be in the country temporarily for business or as a tourist. The constitution applies to all of these people.

	▲	gruez 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		>There are many ways to not have a state or national ID document in the USA. You might simply not have a driver license or passport. That's totally legal. Great, frame it as "poor people without IDs" or whatever, not "undocumented", which in the current political discourse is basically the left's version of the term "illegal immigrant". >You might be in the country temporarily for business or as a tourist. The constitution applies to all of these people. The constitutional right to... watch 18+ videos on youtube while in the US?