[flagged]

ryanjshaw 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> It exists only for the people who think it exists

Right. Which means it does exist. And the point of the article is to bring about self awareness of the phenomenon so that people can improve.

I think you have the same goal with your comment, but your style of communication needs work.

Ironically, I would argue you might benefit from caring a little about how others perceive you.

▲

krelian 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have you thought about why they developed a need for intellectual validation?

▲

abcde666777 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think you're a little quick to hand wave the phenomenon away, as if it's purely a social construct that people care about how they appear to others.

	▲	bravura 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You and GGP both wrong in ironic ways. GGP says don't care about X because it's a social phenomenon, but frequently this position is a form of social identification. You say: X might deeper than social, implying that social phenomena are not important. Thus agreeing with GP. [edit: my position is pragmatic: If there's a broad or important phenomenon, your position on it should be individualized to the value of the phenomenon itself, not based upon some theory-of-origin category assignment.]