| ▲ | throw0101d 2 hours ago | |||||||
> The new players would each get a /24 and everyone would say that's "enough". From where? All then-existing IPv4 addresses would get all the bits behind them. There would, at the time, still be IPv4 addresses available that could be given out, and as people got them they would also get the extend "IPv4x" address associated with them. But at some point IPv4 addresses would all be allocated… along with all the extended addresses 'behind' them. Then what? The extended IPv4x addresses are attached to the legacy IPv4 addressed they are 'prefixed' by, so once the legacy bits are assigned, so are the new bits. If someone comes along post-legacy-IPv4 exhaustion, where do new addresses come from? You're in the exact same situation as we are now: legacy code is stuck with 32-bit-only addresses, new code is >32-bits… just like with IPv6. Great you managed to purchase/rent a legacy address range… but you still need a translation box for non-updated code… like with CG-NAT and IPv6. | ||||||||
| ▲ | wmf 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
ISPs can still get /24 of IPv4 today for free even after it "ran out". This comes from space that was set aside before runout. https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#4-10-dedicated... This IPv4x thing is bullshit but we should be accurate about how it would play out. | ||||||||
| ||||||||