| ▲ | mcherm 2 hours ago | |
No one who understands the first thing about this topic could possibly have read that web page and not realized that it was satire. "Those maintainers worked for free—why should they get credit?" "Your shareholders didn't invest in your company so you could help strangers." "For the first time, a way to avoid giving that pesky credit to maintainers." "Full legal indemnification [...] through our offshore subsidiary in a jurisdiction that doesn't recognize software copyright" | ||
| ▲ | fladrif an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
This is because you're already in that mindset. Try to take the stance of someone who doesn't really know too much about open source other than it's a nuisance to use, this is a great idea! I wanted to use this tool that corporate said we couldn't touch, but now I can! | ||
| ▲ | pixelatedindex an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Maybe I’m missing something but big corps do this, right? I legitimately expect folks like Musk and Zuckerberg to say these things. I get why that’s exactly the reason it’s satire but it’s a little too close to the truth for me to chuckle about it. | ||