Remix.run Logo
tavavex 2 hours ago

This is extremely good satire. Question is, why hasn't anyone done this for real? There's enough people with the right knowledge and who would love to destroy open source for personal gain. Is it that this kind of service would be so open to litigation that it would need a lot of money upfront? Or is someone already working on this, and we're just living out the last good days of OSS?

hombre_fatal 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

What do you mean nobody has done it?

It's an inevitable outcome of automatic code generation that people will do this all the time without thinking about it.

Example: you want a feature in your project, and you know this github repo implements it, so you tell an AI agent to implement the feature and link to the github repo just for reference.

You didn't tell the agent to maliciously reimplement it, but the end result might be the same - you just did it earnestly.

Aachen an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There's a lot of things you could do to be malicious towards other people with minimal effort, yet strangely few people do it. Virtually everyone has morals, and most people's are quite compatible with society (hence we have a society) even if small perturbations in foundational morals sometimes lead to seemingly large discrepancies in resultant actions

You need the right kind of person, in the right life circumstances, to have this idea before it happens for real. By having publicity, it becomes vastly more likely that it finds someone who meets the former two criteria, like how it works with other crime (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copycat_crime). So thanks, Malus :P

CobrastanJorji 2 minutes ago | parent [-]

Also, there's a difference between "willing to do a bad thing for money" and "actively searching out a bad thing, then proactively building a whole company out of it in the hopes of making money."

It's the difference between a developer taking a job at Palantir out of college because nobody had a better offer, and a guy spending years in his basement designing "Immigrant Spotter+" in the hopes of selling it to the government. Sure, they're both evil, but lots of people pick the first thing, and hardly anybody does the second.

imiric 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> why hasn't anyone done this for real?

WDYM? LLMs are essentially this.

tavavex an hour ago | parent [-]

Most LLMs are trained on a lot of the source code for many open-source projects. This 'project' has the whole song-and-dance about never seeing the source code and separating the system to skirt around legal trouble. Why didn't anyone do that yet?

imiric an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Because that's impossible. Any "robot" that can generate code must be trained on massive amounts of code, most of which is open source.

sdwr 31 minutes ago | parent [-]

And how are you supposed to guarantee equivalent functionality by analyzing "README files, API docs, and type definitions"?

dymk 6 minutes ago | parent [-]

The joke is that you don’t.

preisschild 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

not a lot of code is public domain and thus not a lot of training data is available