| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The end is whether the code meets the functional and non functional requirements. And guess how much shoe companies make who manufacture shoes in sweatshop conditions versus the ones who make artisanal handcrafted shoes? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kennywinker 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ah yes - we should all strive to maximize shareholder value - triangle shirtwaist be damnned. Btw in my metaphor, we - the programmers - are the kids in the sweatshop. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | uoaei an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Functional requirements are known knowns. Out of bounds behavior is sometimes a known unknown, but in the era of generated code is exclusively unknown unknowns. Good luck speccing out all the unanticipated side effects and undefined behaviors. Perhaps you can prompt the agent in a loop a bnumber of times but it's hard to believe that the brute-force throw-more-tokens-at-it approach has the same level of return as a more attentive audit by human eyeballs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||