The US held elections during the Civil War.

There is no crisis that would create a situation where elections "cannot be held".

That is to say, if the current admin attempts to suspend elections, the legality of that and the magnitude of the reaction will be the same, crisis or no.

▲

cotillion 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Some of the states held presidential elections, not all, but the winners write history so it worked out fine in that case.

	▲	margalabargala 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Every non-Confederate state held elections. Two recaptured Confederate states (TN and LA) held elections. The only states which did not are the ones that had seceded, and thus were not US states at the time. That's not precedent for the federal government declining to hold elections in any way.

▲

miltonlost 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Account created Jan 6 2020. Now downplaying the current admin attempts.... hmmm.....

	▲	margalabargala 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Please explain how saying "there is no crisis which could justify suspending elections" downplays anything the current admin is doing.
	▲	malfist 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		How are they downplaying it? Trump can try all he wants, but there is no mechanism in the constitution that allows him to do that. He wasn't successful in 2020 and he won't be successful this time. The GOP won't even kill the fillibuster in the senate because they know change is coming.