On the topic of Dolphin progress reports, one of the people who author them has written an interesting blog post on the state of open source emulators and the kind of community problems they deal with: https://emucross.com/rethinking-open-source/

TL;DR if you open source a project prone to hype before you are established with a community, identity, and results to speak for, you risk entitled and uninformed users demanding more than you can deliver. Others may take your half-baked feature branches and release them (to fanfare from users who were able to use it with the exact one game it worked with), taking your credit.

Running these projects ain't easy and the Dolphin team deserves a lot of credit for doing it with a level of professionalism I'm sure many in here don't even see at work. The social work involved in this kind of project should not be taken for granted either.

▲

pjc50 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's got to be a major struggle maintaining motivation in the face of aggressive and ungrateful users. It's bad enough when they're giving you money, it must be much worse when they're not.

▲

rustyhancock 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I was going to say that I'm glad it sounds like trifoce support is in mainline now.

Because some time ago I had multiple incompatible branches of Dolphin to support the games I played.

I'm not sure it was a half baked triforce fork but it was definitely not as polished as the main branch

	▲	petterroea 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		As far as I know it is mostly more immature emulators that struggle with straight out "stolen work" - something tells me the triforce branch is more a matter of "let's get triforce to work and then we can get it working well with the main branch again afterwards"